![]() ![]() An analysis of social behaviour further revealed that partners of chosen pairs behaved more synchronously and stayed closer together than partners of forced pairs. While males were equally motivated to court their female partner, females in forced relationships were less willing to copulate with their assigned mate. The team analyzed more than 1700 hours of observation to find out how incompatibility is reflected in the behaviour of the different pairs. “In socially monogamous animals, the matching of partners may be particularly important in order to motivate each other and to coordinate and share the various tasks“, says Wolfgang Forstmeier. With these results the researchers were able to show that behavioural compatibility plays an important role in mate choice. Interestingly, males trapped in a forced partnership showed a weaker nest attendance during these critical days. During this period the father has the highest responsibility for caring for the brood. “The majority of the young died within the first 48 hours” says Malika Ihle, first author of the study. Moreover, after hatching, the rate of offspring mortality was higher in the nests of forced pairs. However, eggs of forced pairs were more likely to be unfertilized, buried underneath the nesting material or simply disappearing. Both types of pairs were first housed in separate one-pair cages for a few months to ensure that the assigned partners form a stable pairbond, before they were allowed to rear young in communal breeding aviaries.įorced pairs and chosen pairs did not differ in how many eggs they laid, suggesting a similar initial reproductive investment in both groups. Half of the newly paired couples were then split up and force-paired to the preferred partner of another bird, while the other half were allowed to continue with their chosen partner. In doing so, they were able to exclude unpopular individuals that nobody wanted to mate with. The researchers started their experiment by allowing free mate choice among bachelor zebra finches that were maintained in large groups of peers. Zebra finches are socially monogamous, they typically form a life-long partnership, and they show intensive bi-parental care. Malika Ihle, Bart Kempenaers and Wolfgang Forstmeier from the Max Planck Institute for Ornithology in Seewiesen designed an elegant experiment with zebra finches for a cost-benefit analysis of such individual “love marriages”. To date it is largely unknown whether the suppression of such individualistic mate choice would result in fitness consequences. Hence there are individual preferences that may reflect the need for compatibility of the partners’ behaviour or genes. However, within a given species there is often little agreement about who actually is the most attractive partner. An ideal mating partner may provide good genes for the offspring but may also enhance the number and quality of his offspring through being a good parent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |